Train at platformWhatever you’re writing about, it’s important to get all the details right. If you can’t write about what you know intimately, you must find things out and then check again. And if what you know is from your past, unless your setting will sit firmly in that era, it’s vital to get updated.

I recently read a novel by an American author. The story begins in New York. It follows the development of a heroine living on Staten Island and working in a Manhattan office. She moves to London, England.

My own knowledge of New York is based on a short break in Manhattan that included seven minutes in a helicopter, and an evening cruise that passed Staten Island. While I was reading, although I could get the feel of New York, as I remembered it, I didn’t know enough to make judgments about whether the description of a commute from Staten Island was accurate. I was just enjoying the read.

When the action moved to London, I was on more familiar ground. And I admired the way the author could write so well about places I know that I could picture them accurately as I read.

Until I hit one faux pas.

The heroine takes a train to the West Country. And even though I recognized how the track follows the River Exe to the sea at Dawlish, then goes through the tunnels and passes red cliffs on the right and the gray sea on the left, it wasn’t real to me.

Just because the train had left from Victoria Station.

Now I know you can’t get a train to the West Country from there. You can go from Paddington, or even Waterloo, but not from Victoria; not unless you intend to change onto the one from Waterloo at Clapham Junction. And why on earth would you do that if you were starting out from somewhere near Camden Town?

Just that one tiny error and the credibility of that author was lost for me. Because of it, I wasn’t sure whether to accept the rest of the book as gospel. This was probably unfair and illogical because so much of what I knew about was correct, and no doubt a lot of hard work went into getting it that way. Nevertheless it colored the way I read the rest of the book and how I felt about it.

Recently, I’ve read a couple of books with an Egyptian setting. One was a historical novel where the characters lives were wrapped up in the competition between France and England to decipher the language of the hieroglyphics. The other has a contemporary setting in Cairo with flashbacks to the time of the second world war. What struck me about these two books was that I got the same feel from the descriptions in them. Both authors were describing the same culture, which had obviously survived the centuries, and although they did it in different ways, they both felt authentic.

They had obviously done their homework. One of these authors, Rosie Thomas, has written novels based on her own experiences while mountaineering, trekking the Antarctic, and traveling the world. These facts that I’ve been told about her add authenticity to anything I read by her and she is one of my favorite contemporary novel writers.

That is one way to do your homework – by actually experiencing what you want to write about. But if you can’t have the experience yourself, there’s nothing better than getting the information from someone else who has.

Of course you don’t always have your own personal expert to hand, but there are now various websites that will help you find one. For academic subjects, the universities are often keen to help. After all, naming their experts in published articles brings them kudos and free PR. Or check out local societies and organizations. If you can’t find them on-line, go and talk to your librarian, who will always be able to find contact details that you can follow up.

However you get your information, it’s important to get it right. Whether you are writing a full length novel or a brief article, get the facts from the people who really know.

Where do you go for expert knowledge, references, and fact checking? Have you ever found a factual error in something you’ve read that altered the impact of the entire story?

Image Credit: 12-11-05 © René Mansi

7
Comments



Our RSS Feed location has changed!


Subscribe to The Craft of Writing Fiction's RSS Feed.

Download Market Samurai Free Now – 12 Day Trial and Free Keyword Research Tool


7 Responses to “Getting it Right: Research and Fact-Checking”

  1. Heiddi says:

    Hi! Great post. For me it wasn’t so much the factual stuff. What tends to throw me off when I read something is a grammatical error. I’m super anal and observant. I noticed a shift in my attitude towards the writer if proofreading was not done. It really bugs me to read work that is misspelled or incorrect. I put that reading aside and won’t pick it up again. I have not read anything where I know the information enough to say “that’s not right.” But, if I did, I’d probably react the same way. Credibility is shot after that. Take care.
    Heiddi shares: Notable Quotable

    • jean.knill says:

      Thanks Heiddi. Yes, I agree about grammatical errors in published work too. It always amazes me in a book that must have gone through so many stages and been read over and over before actual publication. I do wonder though if it’s because we are writers that we are hyper critical.

  2. Stephanie says:

    Hi Jean,

    I thought the point of a novel was that it was fiction. Basing a book in a time and place doesn’t mean it has to be exact, if it is a novel. Am I wrong?

    It is commonly known that you can ask a dozen people their account of the same event and there will be a dozen versions.

    On the other hand, if a book is written, and it is non-fiction, I DO expect it to be a true account. I, too, would be upset, if I had knowledge that the author got wrong because of lack of research.

    Stephanie

    • jean.knill says:

      Thanks Stephanie. That’s fine if the nocel’s location is also fictional. But for me, I’m afraid, if a story is set in an actual place, you have to get the facts about the area right. The author had tried hard, but not quite hard enough.

      I agree, of course, about people perceiving things differently, but I don’t think anyoen would believe they were in Victoria Staion when they were actually in Paddington or Waterloo. I don’t know where you are based, but I expect you can envisage similar scenarios.
      jean.knill shares: Garden in Process

  3. @ Stephanie: There are elements of fiction where fact is blurred but it’s important that when you base some part in truth it be true. The more real truth you put into a novel the more believable the fiction becomes. Little slips, like the one mentioned in the article above can blow the “suspension of disbelief” for a reader. That’s why research is as vital for fiction writers as it is for non-fiction writers.

    @ Jean: Thanks for sharing your own experiences with this from a readers perspective, Jean. Sometimes, when we’re writing we forgot how the little details matter to our readers. Most readers wouldn’t know enough about the English train system to see the mistake but might notice something else that isn’t quite right.

    This is where “write what you know” becomes a rule of the writing world. It doesn’t mean you can’t write about unique and interesting concepts, it means that whatever you choose to write should first be fully researched.

  4. jean.knill says:

    Thanks Rebecca. Strangely enough, I had a post at Freelance Writerville entitled, Writing What You Don’t Know, which was about research. That site has now been removed so that one has gone into the ether. I’ll have to look around for a new home for it.
    jean.knill shares: Pansies

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv Enabled

Our spam trap can be a little greedy and while I tend to search for comments that have been accidentally filtered before clearing the spam folder some legitimate comments may be overlooked. We don't want to miss out on your insights and thoughts so please let me know if you think your comment has gone astray.